Let's make a most purposeful impact, yes, Jack?

We do know how the Divine Subconscious ticks!

Counterinsurgency

Techniques for psychological manipulation of society are about as old
as humanity itself. Feudal lords, to preserve and consolidate their
power, forever have used punishment and torture as dissuasive agents
of change. “Even thousands of years ago, it was not the techniques per se,
but their conscious application as divide-and-conquer tools, which aided the
ruling classes. No matter how anti-human a particular technique or
therapeutic approach may be, it is not in itself counterinsurgency.
Counterinsurgency cannot proceed merely on horrors; it requires conscious
and systematic application by the ruling class, or its dupes. 1 This was
achieved by fusing psychology and psychiatry in the 1930s.
“The first massive application of psychology as a conscious weapon took
place, in Nazi Germany, especially in reference to eugenics, which played
upon the most backward Aryan illusions held by and imposed on portions
of the masses. While the cause and development of Nazi butchery stemmed
wholly from the world economic collapse, its specific form, eugenics, was
devised by the Nazi’s favourite theoreticians and technicians – the
psychiatrists.” 2
Since then, the “science of the mind,” has been converted into the craft
of mind destruction. Legitimate, therapeutic approaches have given way to
behaviour-modifying pseudo-science in the name of aversion therapy.
This conversion of the mind science was truly shaped by war – “the war
of mental genocide waged by the bourgeoisie against the working class.” 3
The essential premise of the work of Tavistock is the premise that certain
kinds of democratic “institutions represent far more efficient
instrumentalities for fascist dictatorship than the traditional,
straightforwardly” 4 authoritarian models. “From the great oil hoax and
CIA-style brainwashing, the psychological sciences have followed the route
initially outlined in 1945 by Dr. John Rawlings Rees, grand master of
psywar counterinsurgency, in his book, The Shaping of Psychiatry by War .”
5 Rees called for the development of psychiatric shock troops in order to

develop “methods of political control based upon driving the majority of the
human population toward psychosis” 6

through procedures of so-called
programmed behavioural modification. He proposed this to render the
population submissive under the post-World War II economic world order.
Rees told a group of U.S. Army psychiatrists in 1945, “If we propose to
come out into the open and to attack the social and national problems of our
day, then we must have shock troops and these cannot be provided by
psychiatry based wholly in institutions. We must have mobile teams of
psychiatrists who are free to move around and make contacts with the local
situation in their particular area.” 7